[Unbound-users] Insisting on DNSSEC

Olafur Gudmundsson ogud at ogud.com
Mon Jan 13 20:46:51 CET 2014

On Jan 13, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:

> On 13/01/2014 15:14, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
>> A better way might be to propose an EDNS0 option that expresses to the resolver:
>> 	only answer if AD==1
>> and defines a new RCODE to express only insecure answer exists.
> I don't see how this helps. If the application can't be updated to check AD=1, then it presumably can't be updated to send an EDNS option.
> Or if you're proposing to patch the libc resolver, then it could just as easily force/check AD=1, surely?

I mentioned one way this could be done in protocol, another way is to do it in resolver library, 
if an application can tell resolver library ONLY AD=1 then that works as long as the application knows.


ps: I hope libc DNS library be retired, adding this functionality to libunbound or libldns should not be that hard,

More information about the Unbound-users mailing list