[Unbound-users] Unbound periodically stops responding
bry8star at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 1 11:11:42 CEST 2012
I have done few more tests and what i observed are mentioned below:
By using 'Process Hacker' type of windows process manipulation and
Test & result 1 : i have lowered the 'unbound.exe' process priority from
'Normal' to 'BelowNormal', unbound still uses lot of cpu resources when
an app tries to resolve DNS queries. Specially the thread
"advapi32.dll!CryptVerifySignatureW+0x17" uses around 48% or more cpu,
and, dont know what exactly, but something else also uses very high cpu
at that moment, and total cpu resource usage reaches close to 98% or
100% ! then apps, audio-device, mouse etc stops working or stops
Test & result 2 : I have lowered the 'unbound.exe' process priority from
'Normal' to 'BelowNormal', and also changed 'unbound.exe' &
'advapi32.dll!CryptVerifySignatureW+0x17' both thread's priority from
'Normal' into 'Below Normal', ... which did not lower the cpu resource
usage when an app does dns queries. Unbound was causing around 2 or more
seconds of non-responsiveness time, after each 2 seconds or so :-(
Unbound process sometime also used another (3rd) thread
'mswsock.dll!WSPStartup+0x102b" other than previously mentioned two
threads. did not change anything on that thread.
Test & result 3 : I have changed the 'unbound.exe' process priority from
'Normal' to 'BelowNormal', then kept priority settings of
"advapi32.dll!CryptVerifySignatureW+0x17" thread at 'Normal' level, and
changed it's CPU affinity from all cores ('CPU 0' & 'CPU 1'), into only
1 core ('CPU 0'). And then changed "unbound.exe" thread's priority into
"Below Normal" and changed it's affinity from all cores ('CPU 0' & 'CPU
1'), into 1 core ('CPU 0') only, ... then it seems/appearing that,
unbound is performing little bit better than before, that is, even when
the "advapi32.dll!CryptVerifySignatureW+0x17" thread (and something
else) uses very high cpu resources, windows system does not become very
very non-responsive. i observed a non-responsive time for almost around
0.5 second after each 2 seconds when an application was doing DNS
queries for new domains/hostnames.
Test & result 4 : I have changed 'unbound.exe' process priority from
'Normal' to 'BelowNormal', then made following changes for the
"advapi32.dll!CryptVerifySignatureW+0x17" & "unbound.exe" both thread :
Changed both thread's priority from 'Normal' into 'Below Normal', and,
changed both thread's CPU affinity from all cores ('CPU 0' & 'CPU 1'),
into 1 core ('CPU 0') only, ... it seems/appears now, unbound is
performing little bit better than before, that is, even when the
"advapi32.dll!CryptVerifySignatureW+0x17" thread (and something else)
uses very high cpu resources, windows system does not become very very
non-responsive like before (when an app was doing DNS queries for new
domains/hostnames). i observed, around 0.25 second of non-responsiveness
time, after each 1 to 1.5 second of time. :-) so a micro non-responsive
moment was better than longer non-responsive moment.
Solution candidates : if we could use few 'wmic' commands or a tool to
set those threads on such priority and affinity level, along with
setting 'process' priority level, then that would have been great. And
to automate such when Windows starts-up, windows 'Scheduled Tasks' app
can be used. It would be a temporary fix, until the source code is fixed.
Following command allows to change a windows service or app's process
priority level to 'BelowNormal'. (Initially freenode user 'PZt' has
suggested this wmic command to change 'explorer.exe' process priority, i
have changed that and also added in 'Scheduled Tasks', and worked:
C:\Windows\system32\wbem\wmic.exe process where name="unbound.exe" call
Now we need command(s) for changing thread priority & affinity.
Can 'Unbound' be re-coded ? to use its own DLL and CryptVerifySignatureW
function calls on windows for DNSSEC validations.
On 8/31/2012 6:27 PM, Bry8 Star wrote:
> By using "Process Explorer" or "Process Hacker" tool,
> i can see that,
> unbound.exe windows service is using two threads:
> (1) advapi32.dll!CryptVerifySignatureW+0x17
> (2) unbound.exe
> And this 1st thread, uses high amount of CPU resource periodically and
> when any app is requesting DNS queries.
> What can be done to lower the cpu usage of that thread or improve
> performance ?
> If i were to change thread priority of that to BelowNormal, will it
> affect only Unbound Validator windows service, or, will affect the
> entire Windows system ?
> -- Bry8Star.
> On 8/31/2012 2:28 AM, Bry8 Star wrote:
>> I will try to help myself & others.
>> The "iterator validator" option will not work/validate.
>> Below config file gave me better result (on Windows XP), you may try
>> this out and suit to your need:
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> # BEGIN of service.conf / unbound.conf file
>> # Last Modified 2012-08-31 01:30
>> # Copyright (C) 2012 Bry8Star. (bry8 star a.t ya hoo d.o.t c om)
>> verbosity: 1 # logs errors & operational info
>> #verbosity: 0 # logs errors
>> statistics-interval: 0
>> statistics-cumulative: "no"
>> extended-statistics: "no"
>> num-threads: 1
>> interface: 127.0.0.1
>> interface: 192.168.0.10 # My Network Adapter's IP adrs
>> interface: ::1
>> interface-automatic: "no"
>> port: 53
>> outgoing-interface: 192.168.0.10
>> outgoing-range: 950
>> outgoing-port-permit: 52000-56096
>> outgoing-num-tcp: 25
>> incoming-num-tcp: 25
>> so-rcvbuf: 8m
>> so-sndbuf: 8m
>> edns-buffer-size: 4096
>> msg-buffer-size: 65552
>> msg-cache-size: 48m
>> msg-cache-slabs: 1
>> num-queries-per-thread: 475
>> jostle-timeout: 200
>> rrset-cache-size: 96m
>> rrset-cache-slabs: 1
>> cache-min-ttl: 0
>> cache-max-ttl: 21600 # 6 hours
>> infra-host-ttl: 900
>> infra-cache-slabs: 1
>> infra-cache-numhosts: 10000
>> do-ip4: "yes"
>> do-ip6: "no" # for now
>> do-udp: "yes"
>> do-tcp: "yes"
>> tcp-upstream: "no"
>> do-daemonize: "yes"
>> access-control: 0.0.0.0/0 refuse
>> access-control: ::0/0 refuse
>> access-control: 127.0.0.0/8 allow
>> access-control: 192.168.0.10/24 allow
>> access-control: ::1 allow
>> logfile: "C:\Program Files\Unbound\unbound.log"
>> use-syslog: "no"
>> log-time-ascii: "yes"
>> log-queries: "no"
>> root-hints: "C:\Program Files\Unbound\named.cache"
>> hide-identity: "yes"
>> hide-version: "yes"
>> identity: "DNS"
>> version: "1.0.0"
>> target-fetch-policy: "0 0 0 0 0 0"
>> harden-short-bufsize: "no"
>> harden-large-queries: "no"
>> harden-glue: "yes"
>> harden-dnssec-stripped: "yes"
>> harden-below-nxdomain: "no"
>> harden-referral-path: "no"
>> use-caps-for-id: "no"
>> unwanted-reply-threshold: 8000
>> prefetch: "yes"
>> prefetch-key: "yes"
>> rrset-roundrobin: "yes"
>> minimal-responses: "no"
>> module-config: "validator iterator"
>> dlv-anchor-file: "C:\Program Files\Unbound\dlv.isc.org.key"
>> # Downloaded from http://ftp.isc.org/www/dlv/dlv.isc.org.key
>> # DLV, DNS Lookaside Validation, for the root
>> auto-trust-anchor-file: "C:\Program Files\Unbound\root.key"
>> #domain-insecure: "TLD" # TLDs from various TLD providers
>> val-bogus-ttl: 60
>> val-sig-skew-max: 86400
>> val-clean-additional: "yes"
>> val-permissive-mode: "no"
>> ignore-cd-flag: "yes"
>> val-log-level: 1 # log validation failed queries
>> #val-nsec3-keysize-iterations: "1024 150 2048 500 4096 2500"
>> key-cache-size: 48m
>> key-cache-slabs: 1
>> neg-cache-size: 36m
>> # Blocking below TLDs, can also be used to block sites
>> local-zone: "onion." refuse # disallow to go via public route
>> local-zone: "i2p." refuse # suppose to go via proxy route
>> control-enable: "no"
>> # stub-zones SZ, for TLDs from other TLD providers (root opr)
>> # Forward zones FZ, if used hostname/namesrvr in stub-zones
>> # Default Forward Root Zone:
>> #name: "."
>> # You may use your ISP dns, for bit faster results.
>> #forward-addr: i.p.adrs.1 # ISP DNS / Recursive/Caching
>> #forward-addr: i.p.adrs.2 # ISP DNS / Recursive/Caching
>> # Or use other root caching or recursive dns servers.
>> # END of service.conf / unbound.conf file
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> I express thanks to various users from various IRC channels who has
>> helped with various suggestions.
>> If you have better performing config file, then please share, thanks in
>> And use this below technique to run the 'Unbound DNS Validator' with
>> "Below Normal" Priority, so it does not affect other processes, it is
>> temporary fix.
>> (1) Start Windows Task Manager like this:
>> ntsd -c qd taskmgr.exe
>> (2) goto "Processes" tab > select "Show Processes from All Users".
>> (3) find 'Unbound.exe" in the process list. Right click on it > Set
>> Priority > select "BelowNormal". Ok.
>> (4) close Task manager.
>> There are script/batch file as well to do automatically like above when
>> windows starts up. Dont know of a registry hack to do that. If any1
>> knows, then please share.
>> -- Bry8Star.
>> On 8/29/2012 8:08 PM, Bry8 Star wrote:
>>> I'm using 'Unbound' v1.4.18 on Windows XP SP3 4GB RAM 32bit Dual Core
>>> AMD CPU. Unbound is configured with "validator iterator" mode.
>>> "target-fetch-policy" is currently "2 1 0 0 0 0". DLV option is enabled.
>>> It stops responding periodically in my side as well :-(
>>> I installed windows process monitoring tools like, Process Hacker,
>>> Process Explorer, etc and also have firewall able to show, warn, block
>>> any active network connections. Nothing is blocked for unbound in
>>> firewall, only set to show messages/info on what unbound is doing.
>>> Firewall is also set to show message/info what app is trying to
>>> communicate (send DNS query) with local resolver (the unbound).
>>> When user like me tries to do a ping or do a nslookup or do a DiG on an
>>> internet host, or when a web-browser or any other internet service
>>> client app tries to send DNS query via unbound (working on 127.0.0.1 udp
>>> port 53), then at first attempt, unbound internally does its query very
>>> slowly (or sometime does not work), then query sender app shows server
>>> could not be reached or servfail, etc error/result. 'Unbound' starts to
>>> use around 98% or more cpu resources at that point. So other apps, mouse
>>> becomes non or less responsive. After about 1 min or 2 mins, cpu usage
>>> goes down to normal level. And then, if 2nd attempt is done on the same
>>> internet site or host, then 'unbound' usually sends the answer back very
>>> quickly and can reach sites.
>>> If a different fetch policy is used then how will it affect? We need a
>>> better fetch policy. Even when i specified it to use 1 Thread, it
>>> sometime uses even 3 or 4 threads. If "iterator validator" is used, then
>>> will it work better ? then what fetch policy will be better ?
>>> -- Bry8Star.
>>> On 8/29/2012 5:40 PM, Will Roberts wrote:
>>>> On 04/06/2011 02:06 AM, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
>>>>> Well it should respond to the unbound-control utility. If it does not
>>>>> this means it is somehow no longer processing the main loop, or that
>>>>> network traffic does not reach it.
>>>> To add some resolution to this issue, this is clearly not unbound's
>>>> fault. When this situation is triggered I cannot locally ping any of the
>>>> IPv4 addresses on the machine, so clearly the communication to unbound
>>>> as a DNS lookup or via unbound-control are going to fail. I'm at a loss
>>>> as to explain why this happens :)
>>>> Unbound-users mailing list
>>>> Unbound-users at unbound.net
>>> Unbound-users mailing list
>>> Unbound-users at unbound.net
>> Unbound-users mailing list
>> Unbound-users at unbound.net
> Unbound-users mailing list
> Unbound-users at unbound.net
More information about the Unbound-users