[Unbound-users] unbound views

Leen Besselink leen at consolejunkie.net
Tue Aug 11 15:24:34 CEST 2009


On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:55:45PM +0300, Artis Caune wrote:
> 2009/8/11 W.C.A. Wijngaards <wouter at nlnetlabs.nl>:
> > Easier to deploy two servers, one for internal, one external.
> > Changing the code to have two unbounds internally that it chooses
> > from based on source IP would be bloat I think.
> >
> > Who needs different resolving for internal and external?
> > Names on the internet are names on the internet, right?
> 
> We also used bind views, but now we use two instances of unbound.
> Views don't really differ from two servers, every view eats it's own
> memory and act just like two separate servers but two servers gives
> you more flexibility.
> We don't have to touch unbound just to change internal/external acl's,
> just change firewall tables and you're done. :)
> 

(I didn't read the whole discussion)

Maybe it's a good idea to have the one for external be the forwarder
for the one for internal, that safes on queries to the internet.

We do something similair.



More information about the Unbound-users mailing list